Library and Information Science

Library and Information Science ISSN: 2435-8495
三田図書館・情報学会 Mita Society for Library and Information Science
〒108‒8345 東京都港区三田2‒15‒45 慶應義塾大学文学部図書館・情報学専攻内 c/o Keio University, 2-15-45 Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8345, Japan
Library and Information Science 19: 37-54 (1981)

原著論文Original Article

User Studyの方法論調査方法の比較Methodology of user study: Comparison of research method

発行日:1982年3月25日Published: March 25, 1982

Brittain stated that “from a methodological point of view, the field of user study is weak”

The same or almost the same opinion has been repeated year by year in the volumes of the Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. It is said that the crucial reasons for this are the unsuccessful attempt to build and accumulate new knowledge on the past accomplishments and the inability to make use of past mistakes. In addition, we can point out methodological unbalance, that is, a few methods are being used without logical consistency and adequecy while others are completely ignored.

The aims of the present paper are: 1) to discuss the methodological phase of user studies, 2) to examine the methods and techniques of user studies, 3) to compare and evaluate four major methods according to research accomplishments, and 4) to discuss some of the future problems.

This is not an exhaustive discussion of methodology, but a guide or a clue to the future discussion on research method.

This page was created on 2022-07-13T09:46:19.916+09:00
This page was last modified on